Large study finds no significant difference in fracture risk between inlay and onlay designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
A Review of Convertible-Platform Shoulder Arthroplasty
Peer review of study comparing inlay vs. onlay humeral designs in RTSA outcomes, showing similar function and complications.
Does 3D shoulder planning give us any information?
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 3D planning for ROM prediction. Study on humeral stem design and patient factors impacting surgical outcomes.
Computer Navigation in Shoulder Arthroplasty
A Review of the Article by Emilie Cheung and Anna Ramakrishnan in Seminars in Arthroplasty by Peter Chalmers, MD.
Review of “Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for patients with cuff tear arthropathy: do clinical outcomes differ by inlay vs. onlay design?”
Peer review of study comparing inlay vs. onlay humeral designs in RTSA outcomes, showing similar function and complications.
Leveraging Data in Shoulder Arthroplasty
The goal of shoulder arthroplasty is to improve comfort and function for a variety of degenerative conditions. Shoulder surgeons who engage an increasingly complex array of clinical problems must understand the factors that may negatively impact results and lead to a higher risk of complications. A better understanding of risk factors will help not only educate patients about potential adverse outcomes, but it also leads to improved ways to mitigate complications by addressing their root cause where possible.
Inpatient vs Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty
Thomas Obermeyer, MD, reviews a comparison study of readmissions and complications in inpatient and outpatient settings for patients 65 years and older. Read his thoughts on reevaluating shoulder arthroplasty as an inpatient-only procedure in our latest blog post.










